← All posts
Business StrategyBy Peter Van Schaack

The Definitive Guide for Getting Return on Your First AI Project

Last updated: October 15, 2026

I speak to business owners every single day who are paralyzed. Not because they do not believe in AI. Most of them believe in it more than I do. They are paralyzed because the space is loud, the claims are big, and nobody has given them a place to actually start. They have seen the demos. They have read the case studies about companies ten times their size. What they have not seen is a clear, honest answer to the question that actually matters to them: where do I start, with the business I actually run, today.

This is that answer.

The paralysis is rational, not irrational

I want to start here because most of what gets written about AI adoption treats hesitant business owners like they are behind the times. That has not been my experience. The owners I talk to are not behind, they are being careful with something that deserves care. They have real data scattered across real systems, built by real people over years, and the idea of pointing a black box at all of it understandably makes them nervous. That instinct is not fear of the future. It is good judgment.

The mistake is not hesitation. The mistake is staying frozen in it, or worse, overcorrecting and buying five disconnected tools because a competitor mentioned one at a conference. Both failure modes come from the same root problem: there is no order of operations. So let me give you one.

Step one: set the rules before you touch a tool

Before any AI tool touches your business, you need a small set of company wide rules. Not a fifty page governance document. A clear, short answer to these questions:

  • What data is allowed to leave the building, and what never does
  • What AI generated output requires a human to review before it goes to a customer or a decision gets made on it
  • Who has the authority to say yes to a new AI tool, and who has the authority to say no

This is not bureaucracy for its own sake. This is what lets you move fast later without a fire drill the first time something goes wrong. Owners who skip this step are the ones who end up explaining to a client why their proprietary pricing data ended up in a tool nobody vetted. Get the rules straight first. It takes a week, not a quarter.

Step two: audit for control, not ambition

Once the rules exist, resist the urge to go big. The instinct when you finally decide to move is to tackle the thing that would make the biggest splash, usually something customer facing or revenue generating. That is backwards.

Map your processes on two axes. First, how clean is the data behind it. Second, how much of that workflow do you actually own end to end, versus depending on a partner, a vendor, or a human judgment call somewhere in the middle. The processes sitting in the overlap of clean data and full control are your shortlist. Everything else waits.

This is the filter that saves people from themselves. It is tempting to start with marketing content or customer service because those feel urgent. But those are usually the least controlled, least clean processes in the business. Start where you already have the advantage.

Step three: pick one process, not a department

Do not try to transform a department. Pick one process. Something repeatable, documented, high volume, and frankly a little boring. Boring is good. Boring means nobody is emotionally attached to the manual version of it, and the data behind it is usually clean because it has been run the same way a thousand times.

A good real example: I worked with a distribution business on their bid pricing process, a narrow, data rich, repeatable task that happens dozens of times a week with consistent inputs. It was not glamorous. It was exactly the right place to start, because the data was already clean and the business already had full control of every variable in the ecosystem. That combination is what you are hunting for.

Step four: wire it into what you already run

This is where most AI projects quietly die. A business owner adopts a slick new standalone tool, uses it for three weeks, and then it falls out of the daily routine because nobody has to open it. It lives outside the system everyone actually works in every day.

The return on AI does not come from the tool. It comes from the integration. If the AI output is not landing inside your CRM, your quoting system, your existing workflow, it is not transformation, it is a science project. The goal is for the AI to disappear into the process so completely that your team stops thinking of it as a separate step.

Step five: measure the narrow win before you expand

Before you move to a second process, prove the first one. Time saved. Error rate before and after. Dollars per unit, hours per bid, whatever the real unit economics of that process are. This is the step that unfreezes paralyzed owners, because it turns AI from an abstract promise into a concrete before and after number they can see on their own numbers, in their own business.

Skip this step and you are back to faith based adoption, which is exactly the thing that made people hesitant in the first place.

Step six: expand horizontally, not all at once

Only after the first process has proven out should you move to the next one. And the next one should pass the same test from step two: clean data, full control. Resist the temptation to let an early win justify a big leap into something unproven. The discipline that got you the first result is the same discipline that compounds it.

The real starting point

Every business owner I talk to wants the same thing: proof that this will work for their business, not someone else's case study. You will not get that proof from a demo. You will get it from picking the smallest, cleanest, most controlled process you have, wiring AI into the system you already run, and measuring the result honestly.

Start small. Start where you have the advantage. Build from there.